I believe we should agree on what to compare judging if it’s good or bad.
My understanding is there [should be] no fundamental difference in performance of compiled C++ and K/N code, except ARC vs manual memory management. Please correct me if i’m wrong. So i have a feeling that it’s K/N compiler that seems to be the reason [and iperformance was not the goal at the moment]. JB also notes K/N is not ready for performance benchmarking at the moment. Just looking for the opportunity to enable optimizations [which i assume are turned off] to get early rough estimations.
1 Like