Is the jvm method name of function with inline classes stable?

I declared an inline class

value class Creator<T>(val type: KClass<T>);

And defined an interface

interface Itf {
    fun <T> creator(type: KClass<T>): Creator<T>;

I want to implment this interface by generating the bytecode directly by asm(
I found the function name in byte code is “creator-9k1ZQyY”

Here, the suffix “-9k1ZQyY” is added by kotlin compiler

This suffix is very important for bytecode generator.

My question:

If the interface and inline class are stable.
Can kotlin compiler guarantee that suffix is stable too? Does that suffix have nothing to do with the version of kotlin-compiler?

This problem is resolved

kotlin-compiler guarantee it’s stable since 1.4.30,