Safe call with get operator

Any chance we will be able to use ? with the get operator in the future?
E.g.
array?[10] instead of array?.get(10)

3 Likes

Maybe?

What I am concerned about is that if we are able to use ?[] as ?.get(), should we be able to use ?= as ?.set() ? What’s more, ?() as ?.invoke(), ?+ as ?.plus() and ?- as ?.minus() ?

7 Likes

perhaps they could limit it to the get operator

1 Like

I vote for all your proposals :+1: