Any chance we will be able to use ? with the get operator in the future?
E.g.
array?[10] instead of array?.get(10)
3 Likes
Maybe?
What I am concerned about is that if we are able to use ?[] as ?.get(), should we be able to use ?= as ?.set() ? What’s more, ?() as ?.invoke(), ?+ as ?.plus() and ?- as ?.minus() ?
7 Likes
perhaps they could limit it to the get operator
1 Like
I vote for all your proposals ![]()